Poor

1

Very good

2

Excellent

3

Score

Internet research related to the topic

-Searching of information taking only one idea.

-Not having contrasted different approaches

-Having found and contrasted several approaches

-Founding and research at personal level of some approaches as well as giving the student’s own opinion.

Individual work content

-Not clear understanding of the topic

-Vague ideas without going deeply into analysis

-Clear understanding of topics according to the individual work taken to class

-Clear understanding

-Deeper analysis

-Clear organisation of ideas

 -Giving personal opinions

Group work

Poor selection and organization. The quantity and quality of the content are not enough to convey the subject matter.

Good selection and organization. The students selected good content, but some of them are not so crucial for the audience and context. Overall elements are relevant, but some of them are not connected coherently and cohesively.

Outstanding content selection and organization. The students showed excellent selection of relevant content to their context and audience from provided resources. The elements of content are coherent and cohesive and logically draw final statements.

Final project

Mostly incorrect grammar and spelling. The tone and style are inappropriate for the audience and context. The writing includes much incorrect information, and makes the audience confused and distracted. Key points are obscure.

Mostly good grammar and spelling. However, the tone and style do not match with the audience and context. The overall writing is accurate but, redundant and lengthy. Some key points are clear.

Extraordinary grammar with accurate spelling. The tone and style are most appropriate for the audience and context. The writing is not only accurate but concise, comprehensive, and clear. Key points are obvious and clear. Key qualities: conciseness, clarity, logicalness and appropriateness.